A new, no-compromises database architecture for the agentic era
From the source: Google Cloud Blog
Entire database engineering careers have been spent on a single question: How do you scale an OLTP workload without compromising the system of record that owns the data? Exadata answered the question by offloading queries into a scale-out storage tier beneath the database, removing the network as the bottleneck. Azure SQL Hyperscale did it with shared block servers, scaling out to tens of read…
Read the full story on Google Cloud BlogAsk the square
The story is what was announced. If it raises a question for your team, ask the people who run this technology day to day. Your post links back to this story, so the next reader finds it too.
Recent threads in Containers & Kubernetes
How many Kubernetes clusters do you run, and how do you keep upgrades sane?
Fleet size, managed vs self-managed, and the tooling that keeps version upgrades from becoming a quarterly fire drill.
OpenShift vs managed Kubernetes (EKS/AKS/GKE) for regulated workloads
For teams in financial services, government or healthcare: which did you choose and what tipped it: compliance evidence, support, cost or skills?
Something wrong or out of date? Suggest a correction. We reply within 5 business days.
More from Google Cloud
Recent updates from Google Cloud, so you can tell whether this is a one-off or part of a pattern.
More in Containers & Kubernetes
What other companies in Containers & Kubernetes are doing. The category page shows who’s active, side by side.
